I normally don't complain....but!!

[lharri3600]

FELLOW MEMBERS,
I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP WITH THIS ONE. I JUST RECEIVED THIS ONE FROM PSA TODAY AND I'M TOTALLY BAFFLED ABOUT THE GRADE GIVEN. I NORMALLY ACCEPT WHAT COME BACK. HOWEVER, I JUST CAN'T ACCEPT THIS GRADE THIS PSA, BUT COME ON. TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK. NOT ONE WRINKLE,CREASE, OR PAPER LOSS.

[T206Collector]

...you're missing the wrinkle or the glue residue.

[pgellis]

Wow. Great centering on both front and back.....don't see any major stains. If you say that there are no creases/wrinkles, then I would think that that card should be a 6 at least, maybe even a 7.

[lharri3600]

there is no glue, no wrinkles clean. i looked at this one under a loop brfore i sent it in

[bbcard1]

I recently ran across a 1935 National Chicle football common that could easily grade an 8 or better. This is exactly the reason I am going to pay someone else to send it to the grading company who has an established reputation instead of doing it myself.

[Bridwell]

Hi Larry,

It looks like an error. I would crack it open and re-submit it next time you send PSA a batch. This has happened to me a few times.

Ron

[B O'Brien]

Larry,
That thing is trimmed, must have given it the 3 for craftsmanship.
Just kidding! Those are the lumps, but that is one sharp card.
Hope all is well,
Bob

[Matthew H]

I've seen a Yogi berra RC with a 1/4" Surface wrinkle graded ex 5.

Sometimes I wonder if they under-grade on purpose so that you re-submit. On the most recent batch that I sent in they obviously under-graded two of my cards. The strange thing is I also feel like they over graded another two of them. If the same guy graded all of the cards that I sent in then he is either horribly inconsistent or in too much of a hurry to accurately grade. I'm no pro but I assessed the grades on the other cards I sent in the same way he did.