![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am posting this manuscript for Brian Parker. He will follow up with scans and a comment or two....regards
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
here are the last 2 pages...
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-18-2009 at 09:41 PM. Reason: add a page |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
E91A A's, Giants and Cubs
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1st scan: E91A, E91B and E91C backs
2nd scan: E91A Steinfeldt, E91B Steinfeldt (same design + player designations) 3rd scan: E91A Kling, E91B Archer, E91C Gibson (same design + different player designation each set) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Comparision scans of Mathewson and Steinfeldt M116's (ignore the typed name) which I believe are exact photo matches, and the M116 Hartsel, while not the exact photo the artists used to create the E91A card, certainly exhibits the facial characteristics as seen on the E91A.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought I would enlist the aid of fellow Net54 members to help "illustrate" an unpublished article I wrote several years ago about the three E91 sets. In the article, which is posted above with Leon's gracious assistance, I argue that the facial features of players pictured in the majority of the E91A and about half of the E91B set are based either on actual photographs as seen in other contemporaneous card issues, or are at least easily recognizable when comparing the E91 card with another, non-exact match photo of the player, also as seen in other card sets. I have posted images of the complete E91A set, and will post side to side images of three E91's with their 'card buddies' to help bolster my contentions.
And here is how you can help. I strictly did my research based upon the E91's in my possession and the full color card images as shown in the Classic Baseball Card book as is mentioned in the article that was issued over 20years ago. I was able to come up with an index of comparision cards from a variety of issues, which is located at the end of the article, that I believe will prove my theories. But since some of these card issues are uncommon (like the T204's and especially the PC760 Rose postcard issue), and others are from sets that I don't actively collect (like the M116's and Fan Craze issues) I am only able to offer the three comparision cards to post with the article. Thus I will enlist your help in posting scans of any cards from the article's index that you might have so that you can help prove, or heck, disprove, my theories. I hope you will enjoy this article, and perhaps it will succeed in its purpose of garnering a little respect for E91's, which we all know suffer from a horrible reputation. Brian Parker Last edited by brianp-beme; 09-18-2009 at 11:25 PM. Reason: makee much better-like |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the cartoonish image of this set and think it is very 19th century impressionistic.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB or WTTF American Caramel E121 Series of 80 | old-baseball | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 11-04-2010 08:59 PM |
For Sale: 1908-10 American Caramel E91 Tris Speaker HOF (BGS Authentic) | bcbgcbrcb | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 08-29-2009 04:05 PM |
American Caramel's 100th Anniversary (E91)....Part II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-14-2008 02:30 PM |
American Caramel, National Caramel, CA Briggs.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-19-2007 01:41 PM |
E125 American Caramel Diecuts | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-06-2006 08:22 PM |