![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: PC
Thanks Ted. This card shows a So. Leaguer and a Piedmont 350 back, which is consistent with what you and Scot said, but Scot's post indicated the Mullaney card was originally printed in the 150 series and then extended into the 350 for a short period of time. So, I'm still confused as to whether the So. Leaguers were printed in the 150 run. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery Foxx card ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-22-2007 02:15 AM |
Mystery Foxx card......your ideas ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 01-13-2007 05:59 AM |
Another mystery card from Ft. Washington | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-14-2006 09:41 AM |
Help me solve a baseball card mystery | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 10-07-2004 01:05 PM |
Is this Tom's mystery Ruth card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-13-2004 06:33 PM |