![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rare a word that is tossed around more than a kickball at recess in our hobby, but what really is rare and when should that word be applied to an item?
How do you as collectors define “rare” what is your scale of this term? I’m sure everyone sees it different and that’s what I’m curious to know. My scale or how I would define rare is below.
So what is your thinking? Love to hear it. Cheers, John Last edited by wonkaticket; 06-01-2012 at 09:42 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anything I'm looking to buy: difficult. Anything I'm looking to sell: rare.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
+1 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have never read the word scarce and rare as different words. Even from a definition stand point the word rare is used to define scarce. Yet I know in collecting good doesn't really mean good.
Either way I have used both words for cards less than 100 and never used qualifiers (extremely or very). |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
rare for me is one or less.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I mentioned in a previous thread, the coin hobby has a widely used rarity scale, and it's very specific. In other words, if a coin is in the category of say 7-9 known, and then a 10th one is found, it slips down to the next lower tier.
John's scale is a reasonable one but subject to opinion. Whether 1-10 is extremely rare, or 1-5 is, is debatable. We talked about the possibility of creating a rarity scale for baseball cards based on the number of each card known, but most of the people who responded didn't think it would catch on. And looking closer at John's scale 500-1000 known doesn't strike me as very difficult. I would consider that relatively common. Last edited by barrysloate; 06-01-2012 at 09:59 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I call cards with a couple hundred example "rare" and everything else maybe "hard to find". I only posses 2 cards with less than 10 examples and refer to them the same as my cards with 50 examples. I do notice a large portion of members refer to 1915 CJs as "common" and "all over the place" when there are only a couple hundred examples of every card. The term seems to change in relation to attitude at times. I had to do a double take on the thread title as Zach had asked a similar question:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ghlight=scarce |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
card with 150 or 200 example or less are rare for me.
card with 15 example or less in extremely rare or impossible to find in my language ![]() The internet change the signafication of the word 'rare'. before the internet , it was hard to find card with 200 example or less... but now with the internet this kind of card (200 or less ) became more easy to find. Last edited by g_vezina_c55; 06-01-2012 at 10:22 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was reading a recent catalog and it talked about how there are 50 of this specific card graded making it "rare". Any card that has 50 total graded isn't rare. It was from the 1960's to boot.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John, Love the topic....
i like your scale.....going to take a shot... 1 = unique 1-3 = impossible 3-5 = ultra rare 5-10 =very rare 10-30 =rare 30-50 =scarce 50-70 =tough 70-100 =very difficult 100-200=difficult 200-500=tougher 500-600=less common 600-1000=common 1000+ why bother ![]() ![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is the scale that has been used in the coin market for years:
■R-8: This is a unique coin; only 1 exists ■R-7 High: A coin that’s excessively rare; 2 to 3 exist ■R-7 Low: An extremely rare coin with 4 to 12 remaining known ■R-6: A very rare coin with 13 to 30 known specimens ■R-5: 31 to 75 coins exist, classifying it as rare ■R-4: A very scarce coin with 76 to 200 examples left ■R-3: With 201 to 500 estimated pieces, this is a scarce coin ■R-2: A coin that is not common, with 501 to 1250 coins in existence ■R-1: With at least 1251 coins remaining, this is a common coin |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I see one offered for sale only once every 5-10 years, I call it Very Rare!
only T206 that is Rare is the Doyle..... the Wagner, Plank, and Magie are all Scarce IMO |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John- looks pretty good, but I think you need to refer to some of the auction house descriptions to get some stronger language at the top of your list:
extremely rare excedingly rare etc... Last edited by MVSNYC; 06-02-2012 at 01:40 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rare card would be anything that I have and Kevin Andrews would want. LOL
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
gotta love Goodwin's lot titles these days...
![]() Lot #16: “Ultra Rare For The Grade” T206 Willie Keeler “Portrait” Sovereign Cigarettes (PSA 8) – “1 of 1 and Highest Graded Sovereign Cigarettes; Only 1 Graded Higher for ALL Advertisement Backs”! gotta hand it to Bill tho, he gets great cards. Last edited by MVSNYC; 06-03-2012 at 08:52 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anything other than a T206.........
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think something that is truly rare is difficult-to-impossible to find regardless of popularity or demand.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just picked up this 1926-29 P.C. Back, Rogers Hornsby, St. Louis Blank Back in SGC 60.
Where does this rank in the overall rarity department? Not sure about SGC, but PSA lists Total Population of 4 with the highest grade a "4". All 3 variations together combine for total PSA population of 23 with only 8 cards grading "5" or "6". The price was well under $500. - just seems too cheap for such a card - I will buy this kind of stuff all day long and be very happy. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My cards aren't rare, but some are well done.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 05-05-2016 at 08:58 AM. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking at a lot of these threads on using the word rarity & I'm glad to see a lot of honest answers. It is the most overrated word when describing a particular card for sale. Yes there are rare cards out there, but not as many as sellers think there are. Over the last couple years sellers especially use this word in their titles & descriptions in their cards. Some sellers use rarity as an endorsment to get a high price for their cards. There are cards out there of course that are much tougher to get than others, but that necessarily doesn't mean there rare.
|
![]() |
|
|