![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do some collectors consider cards graded authentic to be below a "1" or "Poor" grade? I've heard the term "PSA 0/SGC 0" used by some sellers on eBay and on the forum before. I find this odd, because an authentic label does not convey any grading at all.
The authentic label is meant to infer the absense of a numerical grade. It is the TPG's way of saying "we deem this card to have a defect, but we will not issue an opinion on the grade." In this way, the TPG's defer opinion on a 1-10 scale and instead evaulate the authenticity only with no numerical grade implied. I've noticed that some authentic cards can sell at or below the price of a poor condition card. In some cases, collectors would rather avoid a trimmed authentic with no creases or rounded corners, and choose a Poor/Good card instead with noticable defects to avoid the stigma of the authentic. Is this an example of collectors being irrational? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help Valuing a T206 - Frank Smith Chicago/Boston Card | gregstarling | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-24-2013 08:49 PM |
WTB T3 with Ad Back in Poor/Fair/Authentic Condition | 25801wv | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 10-25-2012 05:56 PM |
poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 08:38 PM |
Help ID'ing and Valuing This Babe Ruth Photo | bcookie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2011 08:47 AM |
Authentic/Altered vs Authentic/Beaten Cards | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-20-2010 10:17 PM |