 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-23-2008, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Should the ACC be re-written?
Posted By: judson hamlin
Not to be an apostate, but since it comes up in threads, let me put it out there: Should the ACC be overhauled? There is no doubt that Burdick, working when he did, with the information at his disposal, did a terrific job. But as we learn more about new sets, corrections to issue dates and other issues, is it time to re-evaluate the work? And, if so, who could/should be involved? Who, in the board's opinion(s) has the expertise (and the time) to do this? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Baseball postcards with interesting written content wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-09-2007 02:29 PM |
| Side written pre-war bat | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-11-2007 08:36 AM |
| ACC designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 09-27-2006 06:50 PM |
| If you don't have it, buy an ACC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-25-2005 08:22 AM |
| Red Hindu T206 w/7C written on back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-25-2004 06:25 PM |
Threaded Mode