![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: josh
I am going to tackle one of these sets in high grade. I would like opinions and what I need to know about both sets. Your feedback is appreciated. I really value the opinions of a lot of members on this board. Thanks in advance! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Michael Steele
Josh, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Dawson
If I had to decide between one of these two sets, I'd go with the T202. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
If you want to do a high grade set then T202 is really your only option. Even with unlimited funds it would be near impossible to complete T207 in high grade in today's market. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marty Ogelvie
IMO - Slabbed 202s have to be some of the coolest looking pre war cards around. 207s (imo) are close to the ugliest. The T205s and T207s are the ugly step sisters to the T206 but at least the T205 has some makeup on.. Those 207s are hard to look at... but that is probably just me. martyOgelvie New York Yankee cards |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark L
I would work on the t-207's, mostly because they are a nice complement to the t-206 set. On the other hand, the t-202's are beauties, no doubt about it. Maybe they would be more achievable in high grade. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
I would say either endeavor will be quite challenging...but...the t202 will be a little easier and less expensive...and will provide a nice upside as well...but in high grade...good luck either way! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason L
Affordability: you want to go with T202 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
"extra money to slab an oversized T202" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
IMO most of the T207 HOFers don't look much like the players...always a detracting factor for me. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
I have a complete set of T207. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ken McMillan
Bruce, |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Bruce, tht T207 set is out of this world! Thanks for showing us, the Lewis card you have is amazing...he's the last one I'm looking for. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Alan
Bruce - |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Dawson
Very nice cards and website Bruce...Thank you for posting it! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: josh
I have decided to go with the T207 set. I really like the look and I want a really hard challenge.... I appreciate all the feedback and I can always count on you guys for the best information! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
Bruce, |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
We find your effort to be extremely admirable |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Bruce- I think a number of those cards made it in to my set from purchases from David Festberg, At that time David was selling cards at reasonable prices and very good customer service and had a nice inventory of prewar cards. I don't know what happened to change all that..... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
Bruce, |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Bruce cited one example in PSA 9. It seems almost impossible given the paper stock. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
You have to search by all of the following: recruit, broadleaf, cycle, t207, etc. and then add them up. There are 200 cards in the set Bruce, if there were only 300 total graded that would barely add up to one full set. If each card in the set has at least 10 copies graded(which I believe is true)...well you can do the math. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I went to the pop report, finally got to T207 and found the same numbers as Bruce. After reading Paul's comments, I went back and noticed they had separated out Broadleaf,Napoleon, etc, without indicating them as T207. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
It's a gorgeous "5", Bruce. Nobody can take that away from you. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Patrick McHugh
Trust me when i tell you a T207 set in grade 5 sgc 60 or higher is not going to happen. The higher graded cards are all locked up in sets that i do not belive will ever be broken up. In fact if one were to compleate a t207 set in any grade that is a huge victory. My best guess is that there are less then 20 compleate sets in the world. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jodi Birkholm
Of course they will be broken up! Despite what the theme song to "Fame" might have you believe, people don't live forever! Completing a quality set solely depends upon how young you are and how much disposable income you have! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Bruce B. we should get your Mr. Lewis together with his two buddies over on my end for lunch sometime wouldn't they look sharp together! |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Patrick McHugh
My point being is that the sets i do not belive will be broken up maybe someday sold as complete sets. Do like the fame reference though! Right now does not matter how much you are willing to invest in t207 the cards are just not there. My best guess is without buying a total set in sgc 60 = 5 or above of which i only know of 3 sets that fit this you will spend upwards of 100k or more and will not find the cards. The t207 cards may in the future become more avalible but at this time they are not. the 3 tough cards pictured on this thread in 5 or higher would run you over 20k just for 3 cards and there are 200 in the set or more if doing variations. A Pelty card in sgc60 would run 4k and add in a donlin which you cannot find in sgc 60 that would add another 8k so just for 5 of the 200 cards in a grade of sgc 60=5 you are looking at over 30k with 195 more to go if you can find them! |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Well put, Patrick! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ken McMillan
Now that is a nice Ward Miller. What do you think that card would go for alone in that condition or lesser condition? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
Listen to Patrick...he knows of what he speaks. You can't buy what doesn't exist no matter how much dough you have to spend. Aiming to put together a solid SGC 40/50 set with nice eye appeal will keep you busy for a few years, if not a lifetime. The Donlin seems to have tripled in price in the last year so start with that one, I wish I would have. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
So true, Paul - 2 years and counting for me ... 30 left, but the big ones remain. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
I built my T207 set between about 2002 and May of 2007. I paid some eye-popping prices for certain cards which drew attention from this board, before I was a member. Some thought I was nuts. I pretty much agreed. Now the prices seem like bargains. I've been trying to upgrade a few, such as Birmingham, Rasmussen and Rath, and haven't even seen them offered. D304 prices and D322 prices have also shocked me. Timing is everything. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
It is Bruce. Your set is phenomenal. I was lucky to upgrade my Birmingham to a 50 at the national last year. There was a woman with a binder of scarce back cards and I bought a few for the Red Cycle backs. You think Donlin is tough, what about Lewis no emblem? I consider my set complete but I don't have this variation and only know of 2 collectors who have one. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
Tbob, I have removed the Lewis (no emblem) from my memory bank. I'm declaring victory at 200 subjects and calling it a day. You're right about Lewis (no emblem). Darn near impossible! |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
Does anyone else find it a bit odd that this set(or at least the rarities within it) is one of the few where prices keep going up, even though most people find it ugly and unappealing? I guess it only takes a few new collectors to really change the pricing structure. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Paul - I think many of the sets contemporary to T206s are going up in value; T205s are showing similar growth to T207s. Perhaps more attention is now being paid to the variations and short prints in those sets as, relative to T206s, much less time has been spent in them in the past. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
Well I wasn't really talking about D304's and things of that ilk, just the mainstream sets. I didn't know t205's had been rising as I don't follow them and a lot more people collect that set than t207. People have know about the variations and tougher cards for years, it's just surprising how one or two new players can affect the prices realized. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High grade t207 --- 4 Sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-11-2008 11:39 AM |
Selling High(er) Grade T202 & T205 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2007 03:01 PM |
Super High Grade Zeenut- For Those Who Collect Only The Best | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-22-2007 01:31 PM |
Starting to collect pre-1950 sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-29-2006 08:46 PM |
T207 High Grade F/S | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-27-2006 07:40 PM |