![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve
How picky are you folks when considering purchase of T206 major HOFers - within the grade ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric Brehm
I'm with you. I collect T206 HOFers in the EX to EX-MT range. I immediately reject about 80% of what I see for sale in this grade range for mostly the same reasons you mentioned -- off-center, skinny borders that make the card look trimmed, print defects, toning or staining. Good eye appeal to me means fat even borders, and decent image quality. A little honest corner wear doesn't bother me at all; in fact to me it gives the card a positive feeling of authenticity for its age. I see T206 sets on the PSA registry, with a much higher Grade Point Average than mine, that have PSA 7's and 8's with lousy centering that I would not have any interest whatsoever in owning. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
I think you are talking about those cards that are net graded. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To grade or not to grade, T206 Cobb style... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-23-2008 06:16 AM |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
Wanted mid grade to high grade of E97's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-19-2006 09:05 PM |
Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |