![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: addie_Joss
I recently picked up an M101-4 common graded a PSA 3 with a Gimbels back. I paid 150 for it. Is this about the price range a card with this back in this condition goes for or did I get lucky and spot a deal? It is the Itallic Gimbels back and not the large block print. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I think that price is in the ballpark. Maybe $75-$150, imo, so you did pay near the top. The italics one is the more common of the 3 from my experience......As a back collector I always enjoy these.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: addie_Joss
I figured I was probably paying near what I should expect. I had just never seen one before and picked it up. Its Nap Rucker, maybe he's a little higher tier than a common but probably not by much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I consider Rucker a star player but not a HOF'er (obviously).....so I do agree with you....a small premium for him, imo. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd
I have a Gimbels, George Stallings.....nice looking card. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
That price is on the high side of the range. Gimbels backs, at least the italics in M101-4, tend to bring about a 35% premium over blank backs, which makes them one of the more common backs. The nonitalic backs are a lot tougher, and M101-5 a lot tougher too. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot Reader
Tim, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Hi Scot, |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scot Reader
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I am far closer to your thinking than Tim's on this. If we use a 35% premium I think that is an absurd number. A blank back common in vg goes for about $25 on any given day. An italics type (the most common) Gimbel goes for at least $75 on any given day. As long as 35% equals 300% I think we are in good shape. regards |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Well, I've never been good with percentages, for some reason--can't get my head around them easily. 35% does look kind of like the goofy premium estimates in the old SCD books. Maybe what I meant was 300% of a typical common. That makes a lot of the tougher backs in the range of 1000% premium. And I'm sticking with about 5% for the total Gimbels % of M101-4. Not that anybody has any way of knowing for sure. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I was looking for a good fight from you. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WANTED: M101-5 Commons & Stars | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-01-2007 07:19 PM |
What's the premium for Piedmont 42 backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 10-21-2006 05:38 PM |
Sporting News M101-4 and M101-5 Company Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-27-2006 09:41 PM |
M101-5 & M101-4 known backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-09-2003 12:26 PM |
t206 Hofer's w/rare backs vs. Commons w/rare backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 02-03-2003 10:39 AM |