 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-22-2007, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Grading of "Tweener" Cards
Posted By: Matt
I'd be interested in the forum's thoughts about cards that have clean sharp corners/edges but a glaring problem elsewhere (example below). How should these be graded? A card with that kind of damage might be considered poor, but without that damage, the card is a 5 or 6. Should that be graded as the average of the two (as it seems SGC did here), or do you prefer a designation such as PSA offers of 5(MK)? 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| December Inventory for Sale -- Lot's of "T" and "E" cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 12-16-2008 09:03 AM |
| t205 Clarke SGC 50 and some other nice "t" and "e" cards for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-13-2008 09:48 PM |
| Grading "Never Before Known" Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 07-10-2007 09:02 PM |
| GAI dropping the "authentic" grading classification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-23-2005 08:31 AM |
| Grading vintage cards "Big Ed" Style | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-30-2002 06:47 PM |
Hybrid Mode
