![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
Curious on opinions on this crossing into a numerical holder for either company....if so...which one is the better odds? And...no, I don't know yet what is going on with the eyes...don't have it in hand yet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I think it would get a 10.....and I agree...his eyes are scary.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bigfish
I think it is graded right on the money. PSA and SGC would give it the same grade. The eyes appear to have been scratched out. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark T
I think you got it for a great price even though the eyes look to be scratched out. PSA only has 7 graded with nothing above a 4. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
My big concern was if the eyes are scratched out or whited out or whatever...that it would indeed still get in a numerical holder (10) or (1)...I thought at times defacing a card was an automatic authentic and not holdered...am I wrong about that? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
Dave, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark T
I have seen SGC and PSA graded cards that were clipped at one or more corners and still got a 1. So if they don't call that defacing a card then i don't know what to call it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay wolt
Too bad they slabbed the card upside down |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
I was debating that one on ebay yesterday, but was shocked it graded at all with the paper loss on the eyes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
It looks to me like the card either has a very heavy corner crease going through the player's name or the cards was actually in two pieces and reattached or is being held together by glue/tape. If that is the case, they will not give it a numerical grade it at all. Hope it's not........ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
Phil- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
From the scan I think it's just a very heavy crease. E106's are quite thick.....and there is no visual evidence of tape....times have changed...I paid $305 for this Matty about 4-5 years ago.... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA vs. SGC: higher grade vs. nicer holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-22-2007 01:48 PM |
PSA, SGC, GAI - The Authentic Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-23-2007 07:31 PM |
T100...does PSA or SGC grade these? Worth getting graded? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 04-05-2007 04:41 PM |
looking for mid-grade E95 cards (PSA 4-6, SGC 50-80) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2006 04:44 PM |
Does PSA/GAI/SGC Grade Cards That Have Been Miscut? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-26-2003 11:10 AM |