![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: david poses
bidding was extremely low with 30 minutes remaining on this item and, having not bought anything in a while, i decided to bid. i don't like non-paypal auctions, and this guy didn't have 100% feedback, so i bid a max of $6.00 and figured if i lost, no big deal and if i won, great. the back of the card scan is clearly black and white, but i have a lot of experience with scanners and it looked like the guy just didn't set the scanner settings properly (i think the back scanned in b/w, not that the card is fake and the back is xeroxed- nobody is that stupid- i emailed the seller- and i was right). nevertheless, i stopped buying t206s for a while because the prices seemed to be creeping up too much, but i got this for $2.26. how could this have possibly happened? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rob
Not that great a deal, despite the low cost. With the paperloss on the back, card would likely grade an SGC 10, so 2.26+$5 for shipping+$8 for grading = about $15, sounds about right for an SGC 10. Thats my cynical grading response. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
Though you may not care, I actually think that card would grade out at a 30 if sent to sgc. Very minor paperloss - Ive got cards with nice fronts, no wrinkles/creases and more paperloss that received a 30. Good deal IMO. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay
You got lucky because of the badly scanned back. When I looked at this listing I quickly rejected this because of the scanner and the paper loss. So you got yourself a pretty good deal. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Priced properly. At least from what we can detect. Nice front though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: david poses
to everyone who thinks the card (at $2.26) is properly priced, do you have any cards to sell? i am interested in all of your t206 cards in similar condition. will happily shell out $2.26 for them. i'll even go up to $2.50. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: rob
David, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: sagard
At $2.26 it is a steal. At the true cost of $7.25 it is a great deal. No reason to factor in the grading cost if there are no intentions of getting it graded. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Why is everyone assuming David wants to get a card like this one graded? 10, 30, 20-- who cares? He got a great deal! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
umm, be careful, i have seen fakes that look great, and up close you can see the difference, namely black piedmont backs...but good luck, hope it's real. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: anthony
dave, me thinks there is a little jealousy here...i have 3-4 with paperloss on the back that are graded 3s and 2s...whether you get it graded or not, its a good looking card. good job and i too hope it turns out to be real. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave
One of the only ways to get a great deal on ebay nowadays is from sellers having bad scans in thier auctions. Its not like it was 6-7 years ago where you could always get lucky with something at a cheap price. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
Is it just me or does the font of the name and team designation look a little too dark and bold to be real? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
are you guys kidding...that card is real...he got a good deal...just admit it. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick McQuillan
Hi Dan, |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
Great, great buy David. It's real and it's a steal. Two bucks. Who would ever imagine. It gives me faith that there are still real bargins to be had, but I think Dave is right - more with bad scans and inexperienced sellers. Finding something tucked away unnoticed in a far corner of ebay is a thing of the past. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matthew
No, it is a great deal. I would buy them all day long in this condition at double that price for anyone who wants to sell. I have purchased from this seller before. Slow shipper (took 3 weeks after payment was received) but cards were securely packaged. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Rob, I'll but every raw t206 in that condition or worse for $2.26. Hell, I'd buy them all at a price that included shipping tacked onto each cards. You can't touch a group of t206s in that condition for under $15 per card. Groups that are heavily creased with paper loss and chunks missing will sell for $10 or more per card. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
after looking at the larger scans on my better computer, i think you're fine, looks real, the back is obviously a B&W pic... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
It Couldn't Possibly Be... Could It? PLEASE LOOK | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 15 | 03-18-2008 11:54 AM |
Quite Possibly The Coolest Baseball Postcard Ever | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 02-08-2008 11:35 AM |
Possibly O/T Does SGC routinely contact people? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-25-2005 08:35 AM |
The worst news a collector could possibly hear | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 12-15-2004 12:15 PM |
Legal assistance needed with PSA possibly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 167 | 06-19-2003 09:00 AM |