![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
without hesitation. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Texas Tommy - Easy for me to say....But yeah I will always go with rarity. The Jackson card will come up for sale a couple times a year. The Texas Tommy you may never see again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
Texas Tommy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
Jax. I just like color cards better than the monotones. And the CJ is a classic image too. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Turner Engle
Texas Tommy Wags no doubt. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
I once had a BIG boss by that name at AT&T.....never have forgotten him. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
TT...rarity always will win! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Wagner. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
Definitely Wagner. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cat
The Wagner is rarer, worth more, and a card of a hall of famer and I already have a '15 Jax and I used to own a '14 Jax BUT I would still take the Jax. I've never had any interest in the TTs. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lyle
Texas Tommy . Rarity trumps eye appeal ! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: daryle
Wagner |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brad
Texas Tommy Wagner |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
that beautiful Cracker Jack card... easy choice. Forget about the $$$ value, I'd pick Jackson, and "crack" him outa that slab. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
Wagner |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
IMO, the Texas Tommy cards are butt ugly. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wesley
I would choose the Wagner. In fact, even if you threw in a CJ Cobb in the same grade to go along with the CJ Jackson, I would still choose the TT Wagner. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
wagner |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ricky Y
Texas Tommy for me too! |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Even though the TT Wagner is worth more I'd take the Jax... I wouldn't be smart enough to take the Wagner, sell it and buy the Jax and have enough money left over to buy a Happy Meal at McDonalds... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mvsnyc
this might sound crazy...nothing personal, just some food for thought... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
not true for me. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MVSNYC
Joe D- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob Pomilla
Simple choice for me. Being a team collector and neither card being of the team I collect, I would take the rarer one, as it would translate into more buying power for me, of cards of the team I do collect. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
Bingo Joe. I made the same assumptions about having it to keep, not sell or trade or whatever. That's how I landed on the Jax - just like the color more. Same thought processes, different outcomes. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
As a scarcity collector the obvious choice to me is the Texas Tommy...If both were valued at $1 each....I would go with Wags.....at the end of the day this is a chocolate vs vanilla question.. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
I'm with Ted Z., never have liked the Cracker Jacks. Just pieces of flimsy paper. Wagner all day. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
Not even close. I can find a JJ regularly; try finding the TT |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: E, Daniel
Texas Tommy, and it wouldn't even have to be a Wagner....never liked this particular Jax card all that much. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
For those that say a TT is unattractive. I think they are very attractive. I love the large bio on back, the card size in nice and almost the same as a modern card, and the photos on most are fairly unique. Saying all that, I also think the CJ cards are attractive too (except the lame 1914 Matty pose). |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Darren
Texas Tommy Wagner |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter chao
Jeff, |
![]() |
|
|