1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph

[Archive]

Posted By: MLSP

Please take a look at ebay item number 140035425811 an 1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph card # 149. Is this card real or is it a fake?

[Archive]

Posted By: leon

I don't know but is your name Tom? And if so you need to move on to another forum.....each Net54 moderator has been down this road till we've got fed up...Let it go...

[Archive]

Posted By: MLSP

What difference does it make whom I am? I have just the same right to voice my option or ask question as anyone own this forum. As you being the moderator what is your problem? Are you trying to hide something or perhaps not let others in on what this forum really knows about the 1916 M101-4 or 5 sets? One thing I do no is that all the different backs that the M101-4 and 5 sets was impossible to make in the year 1916. The reason there is so many blank backs is what was left with no advertisment to place on the backs of these cards. You can take these words to the bank. With all due respect you are in the modern age thinking like most pople do today. Let me tell you something Leon you have to go back to the early 1900's and think as they did. If you can except that then you will learn the real truth, but I think you know that just not telling the whole story.

[Archive]

Posted By: leon

I nailed it. ROLMAO.....(rolling over laughing my arse off)

[Archive]

Posted By: Paul

I wish I knew what was going on here. The card is clearly fake.

[Archive]

Posted By: Anonymous

Spock, explain.

[Archive]

Posted By: bcornell

Anyone who thinks that 11-year-old was obnoxious or that Joe Orlando deserves no sympathy for his customer service has never bumped up against Tom, aka MLSP. He orbits Neptune.

Leon - better you than me, champ .


Bill

[Archive]

Posted By: jay behrens

The next thing he will be telling us is that all those Goudey's with black ink backs and those red Piedmont t206s are real.

Jay

I love pinatas. You get to beat the crap of something and get rewarded with candy.

[Archive]

Posted By: MINE'S MINT

jay, you forgot to mention the cracker jack mini's circa 199-.. errr i mean 1914-1915.. a rare variation indeed..

psa/dna authenticated signature -> Richard M.

[Archive]

Posted By: leon

Not sure where to start but let's just say that every single person on this board, a few years ago? (maybe), told this guy his Thorpe (I think it was) M101-4 Sporting News was fake. Even Bob Lemke told him it was. Tom went onto say it was a conspiracy against him and the books were written to denounce his card.....do I need to continue? It's actually a little humerous. If everyone on this board told me my card was fake I would believe them (especially since his was fake).....Or I could be like Tom and say EVERYONE else is wrong....The card he had had the large white border inside the black line like most of the fakes do. It was a normal reprint/fake. regards

[Archive]

Posted By: Bruce Babcock

Leon, if you decide to "go back to the early 1900's" can I give you a want list to take along?

[Archive]

Posted By: Zach Rice