 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
05-01-2006, 09:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: jackgoodman
Ok- besides the obvious answers, can someone explain why a trimmed Lajoie went for $19000. while a PSA 1 went for $7000? I know the card is rare, but should trimming be rewarded with a better price because the card "looks" better? Should I get out my paper-cutter? 
|
|
#4
05-01-2006, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: aro13
I would not be at all surprised is this card ends up in a holder with a numerical grade and as Scott said it still presents really well even if it always stays in an authentic holder.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970 Topps #303 Error | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 04-05-2009 07:22 AM |
| 1970 Topps #303 Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-01-2009 10:11 PM |
| REA T206 Lots | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2008 09:43 AM |
| REA auction partners-- lots 122 and/or 192 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-26-2007 12:58 PM |
| REA question regarding ungraded lots | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-09-2006 04:01 PM |
Linear Mode
