![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
This is a few months old, hadn't seen it before. Sad piece. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bryan Long
and truly one of the sadest stories in baseball history. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Henry Eshelman
Was Joe that guys "coach"? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: tbob
Joe deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, but Joe took the money and in doing so conspired to throw the World Series. He was an ignorant country boy who had no idea what he was doing could result in a lifetime ban or even to be thrown out of baseball for a year. Speaker, Chase, even Cobb, and untold others bet on and threw games, Joe just happened to do it when the spotlight of the world was on him, during the WS. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kenny Cole
Both are tragic, each in their own way. While perhaps not tragic, it is, IMO, completely unjust that Comiskey, the skinflint who precipated the problem, who knew about it when it was occurring, who did his best to cover it up, and who ultimately came out of the deal far better off than the players who he had screwed, had his involvement overlooked and was elected to the HOF in 1939. What a farce. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve f
Henry asks, Was Joe that guys "coach"? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: howard
Much of what you hear from Joe Jackson defenders is only partly true or not true at all. For one thing he was not a simple minded country bumpkin. Perhaps he was naive when he entered the bigs, like any other player, but by the time of the scandal he was a grown man who had been around the block a few times. He was probably not a stupid man as evidenced by the fact that he was able to run a business after his ball playing days. Yes he batted .375 & was not charged w/an error in the series but look at the situations. In the three games the Sox won (games they likely did not try to throw) he was 6 for 11. In the other games he was 6 for 21 and in one of those games (game 8) he got two hits when the game was already out of hand. Another hit in a thrown game (game 4) was a fly ball that Edd Roush seemingly should have caught. He clearly hit much better when it "counted" then when it did not. In addition, there were questions at the time about his lackadisical efforts on some plays in the field. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Preece1
For everyone that believes that Shoeless Joe didn't do it, they should read the book "Shoeless Joe Jackson and Ragtime Baseball" which has the actual grand jury testimony in it. Jackson might have batted .375, but he also admitted to pretty lousy fielding that cost Chicago runs. In addition, he admitted that he agreed to fix the games and many of the players only joined the fix when they knew Jackson was "in". If Jackson had done the right thing, the fix would probably not have happened (at least according to the testimony). |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Shoeless Joe on this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-14-2008 05:13 AM |
Shoeless Joe in the Hall? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 08-11-2007 06:31 AM |
Shoeless Joe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-04-2005 09:52 PM |
Shoeless Joe CJ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-22-2003 11:03 AM |
shoeless Joe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-05-2002 09:44 PM |