![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
I was planning on bidding on this until the seller responded to my question in regards to the authenticity of the card: |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
Can you post a link to the auction? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
sorry, here you go: |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
Thanks. I was watching that one. With that idiotic story, plus the seller's 97% feedback, I think I'll stay away. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: base2base
Here's a real w514 Joe Jackson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
that looks pretty white for a legit w514. everyone I've ever owned is creame colored. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
well, as it turns out the seller lives in my city and has agreed to let me look at it prior to the close. i'll let you guys know. i have a common w514 for comparison. anything glaring i should look for? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
bring a loupe or magnifying glass and make sure the printing matches up. Also check to make sure they are made of the same paper stock. I haven't tracked the w514 Jax in a while, but in this condition it will probably go for $300-500 depending on just how crazy the market has gotten in the last year. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeremy
If I were you, I'd look closely at the color of the Sox emblem. From the Ebay scan it appears more dark/black than the original. Hopefully your common is a White Sox. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
color isn't going to be a big concern. Ink colors are all over the place on these strip cards. I had a Cobb that was really washed out looking and Ruth that was on almost the opposite end of the spectrum. The big concern is that the printing style matches up along with the paper stock. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
Just going by the scan I don't see anything wrong with the jackson in the eBay auction but the image "base2base" looks fake. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
just to update- i havent been able to hook up with the seller to look at the card in person (through no fault of his). with bidding already over $440, im out anyway- i cant bring myself to spend that much money on a strip card. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
of the board beating someone to death who's trying selling a legitimate card. The scan in the ebay auction looks more legit than either of the two real ones posted by board members. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Lloyd
I would agree 400+ is alot for a strip card but I think strip cards are really an unexplored area and I think will grow in value and popularity in time while other more main stream cards will stay the same... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
>i agree- i actually like strip cards quite a bit. but by comparison, i bought an entire w516 strip set for around $500 recently (ruth, cobb, matty, walter johnson are all in that set). |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Howie
Scott, b2b's scan is just poor quality, and Julie's scan is small, but they both appear to be real cards. The scan of the Ebay card is good enough to see some areas which raise suspicion. The lettering at the bottom doesn't look solid and one color. There's no indication of a black border around the White Sox logo. The fine lines for his hair and the fine lines under the bill of the cap seem to bleed together and are darker on the Ebay card. The lines on b2b's and Julie's card are sharp. Fines lines are printed on dollar bills to look different when copied. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Forrest
Don't know that I agree on your analysis of the various scans presented, but even if I were willing to buy a strip card I wouldn't buy this one, for some of the reasons you listed. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
First of all, it isn't a scan, it is a digital photo. Much of what has been commented upon results from foreshortening when you take a picture from a single point. That's why the card looks bigger at the bottom and darker/muddier at the top. Scanners don't have that problem because they move over the full surface of the item from the same distance throughout. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jamie
the jackson closed at $861! im floored- i never wouldve guessed even half of that. i guess it's a good sign for strip collectors, but a bad one for low end collectors like me looking to pick up a cheap jackson |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Howie
This one was pretty nice. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhys
These have been selling well for quite some time now (W514 Black Sox Players). I just sold a Chick Gandil on ebay in about G condition for over $100, and I know people pay $400-$500 for nice condition Weavers and Williams from this set so I am not surprised at the final price at all. This is not a new trend but if you have not noticed the prices going up for the last 3-4 years it might seem steep. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hoytdunk
W514 Black Sox sell great. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
one off to a solid start. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Elkins
For paying over $1500 for a PSA 8 Tom Barker Jackson. At least it has a real photo of him. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1919-21 W514 Hand Cut Joe Jackson PSA Authentic | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-16-2008 05:32 PM |
Shoeless Joe Jackson E90-1 on E Bay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-28-2007 09:09 AM |
W514 Joe Jackson PSA | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 09-17-2007 10:07 PM |
W514 JOE JACKSON | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-18-2007 03:16 PM |
1919 W514 Joe Jackson question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-23-2006 04:15 AM |