| 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: Todd Schultz 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	r316 5x7s?  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: Ben 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	W554's  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: Julie Vognar 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: pete 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	why do some have name on bottom and some dont??  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: Paul Griggs 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	The two without the bottom script are described in the add as having a thinner card stock, so I suspect those two are R316 5 x 7 photos, & the others W554's. The R316 5 X 7 photos are thin like the smaller Kashin R316's. The R316's & W554 share the same photos.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: pete 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	i did see that after...are they worth the $135 ? just curious, not interested in bidding...really.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Posted By: Paul Griggs 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I could be wrong about those two being R316's. The R316 5 x 7's supposed to have the team listed too. The thinner card stock is what made me think of the R316's. I now remember that I bought a Ruth W554 from WV's Shoebox cards awhile ago, that had no bottom script. I sent it back, due to it looked much worse than the scan. As far as it being worth $135.00 probably, but not much more, due to the condition. I'm planning on bidding, because I only need the O'Doul to complete the set.  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
  | 
	
		
  |