![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As most of you know I am in the process of auctioning one of the closest to completion E107 sets ever put together. While scanning cards for the next auction, I came across a production oddity that I have not seen before in handling well over 1,000 E107's in my 30+ years of collecting them.
A wet sheet transfer on Ginger Beaumont, creating a very clear ghost image on the back of the card... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a little hard to see on the screen. Is it any more clear on the card? I can make out some of it.
Stacked on top of each other at printing? .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-09-2024 at 10:18 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree with Leon, another picture would be helpful. It almost looks like bleed from the front, but hard to tell from that picture.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes it's a wet sheet transfer, from the sheet be stacked on the previous sheet. It's a little darker in person, you can see the caption transfer as well(there is no such thing as bleed through)
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, just very hard to tell from that scan.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I played around with the contrast, etc. to show off the transfer better (perhaps somewhat closer to what it looks like in hand).
Brian |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very cool Scott!
I've not come across nearly the amount of e107s you have, but from my experience, e107s are a very "clean" set. I can't recall any sort of a printing gaffe or oddity from this issue up to this point. A wet-sheet transfer like this one would probably be the biggest one I've seen so far! I do remember your group of e107s auctioned off in September contained one player with a diamond cut as well, which I thought was kind of neat. I think it was Criger....never seen one of those before either.... Last edited by shammus; 10-09-2024 at 02:43 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott, thanks for the 2nd scan, it's much clearer now. Really neat discovery.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Scott, thanks for the 2nd scan, it's much clearer now. Really neat discovery.
Quote:
That was actually me monkeying around with Scott's scan...who knows if I made it more visible than it is by the naked eye. Perhaps Scott can let us know how closely this updated scan represents the card's back. Brian |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Brian,
Your scan certainly shows the transfer better, but is probably a little darker than the card in person, even though it is immediately visible when one flips it over. Thanks for the better image.. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scot, I've never seen a ghost image on an e107. Very cool, thanks for posting
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you find this concerning? | samosa4u | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-08-2020 02:26 PM |
Best...Find....Ever | Lordstan | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 51 | 05-24-2017 09:01 AM |
Best...Find....Ever | Lordstan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 07-24-2015 11:52 PM |
New find! Killer general store find!!! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 12-20-2012 09:47 AM |
Fargo Find! The latest Old Judge find by David Levin | gfgcom | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 09-18-2009 12:01 PM |