![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Price includes USPS EXPRESS shipping and tracking.
"I'll take it" takes precedent over all ongoing negotiations. FS: beautiful example of a high end 1948 Leaf PSA 3 (new label) Jackie RC. Looks nicer! Price: $12.5k 100% seller rating (942) on eBay Reputable seller with many purchases and sales on MySlabs Many references on Facebook and IG Do not hesitate to reach out via PM. Happy to discuss. A414ED46-3793-44B2-992D-6920CBAB6944.jpg AFBCA0D9-8674-4294-A56D-ADEBA73FE572.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still available
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bump
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just curious. I see many listings that say "looks nicer". If that's the case, why wouldn't the seller resub to get a higher grade? Why ask a price close to the next higher grade and make the buyer risk it? Always wanted to know.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to VCP, the avg. price for a PSA 3 is $12k. PSA 4 is $14k. I think my price is in line with PSA 3s and not the next higher grade. Secondly, grading is subjective and inconsistent. There are no guarantees. If you submit this card 10 times you’ll get some varying grades I’m sure. Third, there are varying condition and levels of cards within a specific grade. Some 3s look nicer and some 3s look worse. No two cards are exactly the same, hence the saying, buy the card and not the grade.
Last edited by afenili22; 07-14-2024 at 09:12 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not trying to be argumentative, but what's the point of grading then? For me personally, when I buy a card I go by the grade or until the grading companies add the following to the label: EX 5 But Looks Nicer.......PR 1 But Looks Under Graded.....etc
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Probstein uses that language a lot.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree it is a very nice image and corners are very solid. I think centering t/b kept it from being a higher grade.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Until grading becomes an exact science, I would highly recommend buying the card, and not buying solely the grade. Any seasoned collector will tell you the same. Just search ebay and look at different examples for the same grade. The differences are incredible with some. Some cards were graded 2 decades ago, some last week, which grade do you think is more accurate considering the advancement in technology. No offense, but the ones who are buying the grade and not the card are the ones in the hobby not investing wisely. To each their own though...
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judging by your comments, I’m guessing you’ve never seen a card cracked, regraded, and it received a higher grade? It does happen and I’ve done it countless times on lower valued cards. I’m not paying $1000+ to PSA for that gamble on this card though, which is why people like me post that it “looks nicer” in instances like this. Thanks for your comments. I can’t help explain it to you any more than I have. Best of luck buying your grades.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This isn't really the place for a lot of back and forth. This is a place to buy, sell and trade. That card does look nice for the grade. Nuff said. Good luck with the sale.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 07-16-2024 at 08:04 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 1 | sycks22 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-04-2024 09:58 PM |
FS: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 4.5 | ajjohnsonsoxfan | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 03-03-2021 12:57 PM |
WTB: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | Jetsfan | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-12-2020 10:05 AM |
WTB: 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson | JohnnyFinance7 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-03-2020 11:54 AM |
FS: 1948 Leaf #79 Jackie Robinson | poorlydrawncat | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-25-2013 03:27 PM |