|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is the 2” x 3” sizing consistent? Received one that is off by 1/32” both directions. Condition is poor, well rounded corners etc. Not seeing the point of a trim unless it was a looooong time ago.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Front
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Off-hand, from that picture, it doesn't look trimmed to me.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just sent my first DeLong to SGC. When it comes back, I’ll be happy to post a scan for comparison.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Last one for 1933 DeLong set | Jwkeen | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-25-2022 07:55 AM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 10:51 AM |
| 1933 Tattoo Orbit vs. 1933 Delong: Which Do You Like More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-24-2009 10:17 AM |
| WTB: 1933 Tattoo Orbit and 1933 DeLong (List Inside) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-22-2008 07:04 AM |
| WTB/WTTF: 1933 Tattoo Orbit or 1933 DeLong | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-21-2008 10:34 AM |