![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Saw someone put a CSG graded S74-2 colored silk in the B/S/T, and was immediately intrigued as I didn't know they graded silks. So I took a quick look to see what was being shown on CSG's population report. And for the record, I had never tried looking up anything on their pop reports before. The first thing(s) that jumped out at me when I finally found their pop report page was that they have grades of Gem Mint 10, and also of Perfect 10, and apparently no grade of just "A" Authentic?!?!?! What the hell is the difference between something that is Gem Mint and Perfect? The way they have them listed in their pop report, it appears the Perfect 10 is supposed to be better than the Gem Mint 10 version.
And then no "A"/Authentic graded items listed on their pop reports? Does CSG not give Authentic grades, or do they just not bother to list them on their pop reports and reserve it only for items with numerical grades? Very strange to say the least. If nothing else, this definitely seems to indicate that the CSG grading levels may be skewed and put more emphasis towards modern cards than for vintage/pre-war cards. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think when all the sub-grades are 10, that comprises the "Perfect 10" card.
I think Beckett had/has something similar, but I'm not sure. I've never gotten a "Perfect 10" in anything in my life..........................well, except for my wife, in case she's snooping on me in this thread. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
BGS version is Pristine, now with a Black Label instead of gold/silver. SGC also has a Pristine for 100/100 on the old scale when Gem Mint was only 98.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is the hard part of the grading industry
There is no standard each does it it’s own way of grading Plus each sets it’s own standard for what qualifies for that grade And obviously this makes it difficult for us to compare cards with similar grades from different companies But as always as Best as possible we should buy the card not the slab. But so much inexperienced people/collectors/investors so they rely on the grade over the card
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about interpreting PSA Pop reports | Gobucsmagic74 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-28-2017 07:36 AM |
PSA Submission Levels | GasHouseGang | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-31-2009 11:29 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Question about trimmed cards in PSA/SGC pop reports. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-16-2006 03:02 PM |
Question about Population Reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-22-2002 06:20 AM |