![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m very excited to add my first T204 Ramly card to my HOF “playing days” quest… I just received this Bender today and am planning to send to SGC to put him a great looking tux.
I shared the photo with another card friend who worries that this card looks trimmed to him (compared to his own Ramly cards, much fatter borders) But I just measured this one (very rudimentary measures, as you can see) and looks like it does measure well to the expected 2 and 1/2 by 2 inch standard for this card. Wondering what other experienced T204 collectors think - does this card look like it may receive a numerical grade from SGC? No matter what, it’s an absolute beauty! I’m just looking for some experienced options for likely grades. Thx for weighing in Jeff
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks fine to me, but TPG often think they know more than myself on T204's
![]() It's a nice looking card and has the correct border dimensions and edge look. While I can't tell from the scans if there are any minute wrinkles(does not appear to be so) I would think a 5 or 5.5, heck maybe even 6 from SGC, PSA would be a 4 from recent submission returns. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a nice looking card. Congratulations.
I'd place it in the 4/5/6 range, based on what the grading companies do with Ramly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the left side is trimmed. To me the real give-away is the back. Look at the top right corner on the reverse, and then all the way down the side. It is missing the light soiling present on the other corners and sides. Basically the edge is too fresh and doesn't match the other sides. That top corner is just oddly sharp as well. Finally if you look carefully at your ruler you are short of both the 1" and 3" marks by almost 1/16" total. That bothers me less than the other issues though.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 01-11-2023 at 07:30 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After seeing Scott's post, and taking more time to look, I agree with him. The top maybe trimmed as well.
It's still a beautiful card. Quote:
Last edited by Corporal Lance Boil; 01-11-2023 at 08:22 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like a very slight trim in at least 2 places. I don't think it would get a numerical grade.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Net54 members get it right again… after my hopes were raised for a white hot minute and I thought my new Ramly might get a numerical grade, my expectations were tempered by others or you!
And sadly, you were right! Just got noticed Bemder got an “A” grade… but he sure does look sharp in his tux, right??
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's still a gorgeous card, with very nice eye appeal. And a nice back to boot.
Last edited by Corporal Lance Boil; 01-25-2023 at 04:13 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would agree, thx!
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks to me from your ruler it measures a bit narrow? Was it sold to you with a representation it would grade?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-25-2023 at 05:01 PM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its a heck of a great card with a lot of eye appeal. Congrats on the pick up! A slight trim is way better than "color added" or rebuilt corners IMO.... of course nothing beats Au Natural...
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I paid at a good price point for an “A” - now just deciding if I keep or sell 🤔🤔🤔
__________________
************************************************** *********** Jeff "Belfast1933" - honoring my dad, Belfast Maine and Right Fielder for the mighty East Side Rinky Dinks https://grossvintagebaseball.com/ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Looking for high grade T204 Ramly EX or better | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-23-2008 11:17 PM |
SOLD - High-Grade 1909 Ramly (T204) - Tim Murnane HOF Rookie Card (SGC 60) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-30-2008 05:21 PM |
Will this get a numerical grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-16-2007 02:19 PM |
Looking for low grade T204 Ramly cards.... | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-29-2006 06:25 AM |
WANTED: Low grade T204 Ramly cards | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 04-12-2006 05:10 PM |