![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've read about wet sheet transfers, but I have a card in which the back has an ink transfer from something else (post factory). Would PSA give this a MK qualifier similar to a stamp? Or could it escape the qualifier fate altogether and live a happy life as a normal PSA 1? Thanks.
Last edited by scmavl; 04-04-2021 at 10:59 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Wet Sheet Transfer vs. Impression Cylinder Transfer | Sean | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-31-2020 01:40 PM |
t205 Ghost/Wetsheet Transfer - Piedmont reverse ghosted onto card front - SOLD! | shammus | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-10-2018 08:54 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
T206 Ghost & wet sheet transfer (same card) | PEEK enterprises | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 09-24-2011 02:25 PM |
T206 Pied. Fact. 42 and Piedmont card with sweet cap transfer front | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 01-04-2008 10:13 AM |