1992 Leaf Baseball Question

[BaltOrioles]

SCAN9585.JPG SCAN9587.JPG


I've recently been trying to put together some Orioles team sets with all the variations.

I know that the 1992 Leaf and Leaf Gold sets can be found with backs that have either Inc. (with period) or Inc (no period).

SCAN9586-1.jpg SCAN9586.JPG

To date, I've found all the regular Leaf cards with both variations, except #52 Cal Ripken Jr. I can only find him with the Inc. (with period) variation. Can anyone confirm the Inc (no period) variation?


In the Gold set, I've found both variations in the 2nd series cards (#300 up), but not in the 1st series cards. All the 1st series cards I have are Inc (no period), except again the #52 Cal Ripken Jr card. All the Ripken cards have the Inc. (with period) variation.

Does anyone have any 1st series Gold cards with the period or a Cal Ripken without the period. Looking for any confirmation they exist.

Thanks for any info.

[GoldenAge50s]

I have several Ripken's & they ALL have the DOT.

[BaltOrioles]

Originally Posted by GoldenAge50s

I have several Ripken's & they ALL have the DOT.

Thanks for checking.

[Fetamore]

My Ripken’s have the dot. I have about 300 first series Gold Edition cards, two have the dot.
Numbers 40 & 58. Tony Phillips & Roger McDowell.
In both series, most cards were missing the dot.

[BaltOrioles]

Originally Posted by Fetamore

My Ripken’s have the dot. I have about 300 first series Gold Edition cards, two have the dot.
Numbers 40 & 58. Tony Phillips & Roger McDowell.
In both series, most cards were missing the dot.

Thanks for the input.

[insidethewrapper]

All my Leaf Black Gold Ripkens have ( Inc. ) the period after . I found a total of 4 cards that have the (.) after inc (Inc.) in the 1992 Leaf Black Gold , #40 Tony Phillips, # 46 Tom Browning, # 52 Cal Ripken and # 58 Roger McDowell. All in my inventory came that way, therefore I found no variations, either the cards had a period or they did not.