![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently picked this one up. Now I have my doubts after reading Hall of Fame autographs reference guide, which said 99% of certified Ruth’s are fakes. So I’m turning to other collectors on this one.
So what is everyone’s opinion on this? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wish I could help. I don't collect autographs for this very reason. The Unknown and that includes grading company opinions. I heard from a FBI source years ago that over 80 percent of autos are fake. Some of these forgery guys are so good it would fool anyone. I think there was a piece on 60 minutes about one guy who would sign Babe Ruth and many others infront of the camera and fool everyone. With all that being said, Babe Ruth was fan friendly and signed a ton of stuff. To me the Ruth looks like all the other Ruths Ive seen. Id actually like to see a bad looking Ruth auto, as they all seem perfect.
__________________
Love Ty Cobb rare items and baseball currency from the 19th Century. Last edited by BeanTown; 05-24-2020 at 06:07 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My opinion is no, it's not real. Something I've seen from other posts asking for authenticity is about the aging of the paper beneath the signature. You can easily see all of the creases and wrinkles, yet they don't appear to have affected the signature in any way. So then it seems that someone asked Babe to sign a piece of paper that was already in horrible shape.
What I would say is that someone recently aged the paper and then forged Babe's signature over all of the creases. There are experts on this board that I would hope chime in their opinion, but just based on the signature not being affected by wrinkles and creases, I would assume its fake. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo Last edited by todeen; 05-24-2020 at 07:52 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow! Who authenticated that? What was the provenance that went along with the auto? It looks ugly!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PSA actually certed this, and Beckett quick review passed it. Wanted the opinions of other collectors
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Authenticated by James Spence.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if it was cut from a document? Or ruth was drunk when he signed it? Or if ruth really had a secretary sign all of his nice beautiful autos and his handwriting was actually pish posh.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
__________________
Barry Larkin, Joey Votto, Tris Speaker, 1930-45 Cincinnati Reds, T206 Cincinnati Successful deals with: Banksfan14, Brianp-beme, Bumpus Jones, Dacubfan (x5), Dstrawberryfan39, Ed_Hutchinson, Fballguy, fusorcruiser (x2), GoCalBears, Gorditadog, Luke, MikeKam, Moosedog, Nineunder71, Powdered H20, PSU, Ronniehatesjazz, Roarfrom34, Sebie43, Seven, and Wondo |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it looks very authentic!
Last edited by Caseyatbat; 05-25-2020 at 06:33 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The autograph in question is without doubt real. Now I can’t see it in hand. Maybe it was photocopied on old paper. But I doubt it. As long as you can see the ink, pressure, indenture, etc then it is real. I would buy it for certain.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I paid $3850 for it |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I paid $3850 for it
Probably a little on the high end of the scale, but a great looking authentic autograph! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I wanted a no doubter though, and I thought this was very strong autograph so I pounced |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this Ruth real? JSA says yes | w7imel | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 34 | 08-25-2015 10:23 AM |
Ruth Sig - Real or Not so much? | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-30-2011 08:54 AM |
Are 1917 Collins-McCarthy Babe Ruth and 1921 Oxford Ruth real? | Peleseller | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-07-2011 02:07 PM |
Real Ruth or not? | yanks12025 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 11-04-2009 01:06 PM |
This '33 Ruth #53 isn't real, is it? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-22-2001 12:51 PM |