![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I always chuckle when I read that a card for sale is undergraded by the professional graders. No one wants to admit the card is over graded. I love this card and I bought it already graded. But really, is this a 40/3? Nope...
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Isn't grading subjective? Yes there are guidelines but how someone interprets the guidelines could cause differences in "subjectivity". That said, one collectors 30 is another collectors 20 which is another collectors 40.
In the case of that card shown in the original post, I think the grader was more than generous. I wish all cards I might submit would go to that grader.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Similar one here. I was expecting a 30.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Probably should have been a 1 but who cares, right?
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was my 'engagement ring' from my fiance (soon to be wife).....19 years ago now and only my 3rd vintage card at that time. Bought it in a GAI 3 slab, crossed it to an SGC30 tomb, and finally it rests in a BVG 2 brick as I like everything post WW2 in beckett.
And yeh, only leaving out of my cold dying hand. ![]() Front's a stunner, back has wax/gum stains and small paper rubs/lift. Overgraded or just right? ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by 68Hawk; 03-10-2020 at 04:38 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, looking at the paper loss to the front of those cards above from Jerry, my Mick might actually be undergraded!
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd say 2 seems about right, and presents great for that grade!
Quote:
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
. Perhaps an EX card in early 1990's, but certainly not an EX card in today’s grading world. Light hint of a paper clip indentation along upper right border. Small spot of paper loss along bottom right border. Otherwise free from creases and such. But this card might still qualify as one that has good eye appeal for the actual grade. . Last edited by HexsHeroes; 03-11-2020 at 12:43 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like a 2 to me...depending on the back
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206REF...NEW TOPIC...How do you collect T206's?..Graded vs Ungraded..show your cards | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-11-2019 09:30 AM |
Show professionally graded cards that you consider inadequately graded or in error. | jerrys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 07-05-2019 01:46 PM |
Show...me...your...UNDER-GRADED CARDS | lowpopper | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 20 | 05-09-2018 06:09 PM |
Show your wrongly graded cards | ruth-gehrig | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 11-06-2011 08:06 AM |
Show some over graded PSA cards! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 08-21-2007 08:05 PM |