![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is original because it was found in a barn and in a cigar box.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1916-Ty-Cob...cAAOSwMs5drkwA .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-24-2019 at 10:58 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ffs
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions Last edited by Aquarian Sports Cards; 10-24-2019 at 11:26 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
apparently it was partially smoked as well!
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe everybody already knows this, but Holmes to Homes backs are only found in M101-5, and Cobb is not in that set, only in M101-4.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's too bad. I was hoping to win the "Did you ever take a chance and it paid off" thread.
Last edited by Arazi4442; 10-24-2019 at 03:34 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
seller's bowman & topps Mantle are fake too. shocking!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you know the Mantles are fake? Look reasonably legit to me, but maybe I'm missing something. Suspicious with the price, for sure, but I can't see (or know what) the signs are. Would appreciate the tell-tale signs.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Isn't there an unwritten rule about outing a live auction? I was going to jump on that.
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The signs for the fake Mantles are mostly in the wear on the cards -- if you look at the back of the Bowman, you see "crazing" lines with some tone coming through. I've ONLY seen that kind of wear on artificially aged fakes -- you see some of the same kind of wear on the front of the Cobb. The edge wear is terrible, too -- hard to articulate, but it's not what you see on vintage 1950s card stock. At the bottom, you can see how the white-ish color of the back is wearing off, which it should not -- that color should be part of the cardboard itself.
compare to (a random image find) this real card with some wear: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/12...g?v=1528823538 on the 1960 there are fewer red flags but the image quality is terrible -- see Mantle's head/hat, the blacks are all running into a big mess, vs. the clear, subtly toned original. Also they both appear to be hand cut on at least one edge? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() That would have been the worst 50 bucks that person had ever spent.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Holmes to Homes ad | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-29-2019 02:33 PM |
Holmes to Homes Bakery | Jaybird | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-24-2014 10:59 AM |
Holmes to Homes Babe Ruth | e107collector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-08-2013 09:32 PM |
Holmes to Homes Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 03-26-2008 07:21 AM |
1916 Holmes to Homes | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-19-2006 06:05 AM |