![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently purchased this S74 silk of Chief Bender. I would like to submit it to SGC, but am a little confused on the difference between the white and colored versions. This is my first silk and I would love to learn more about them. Any help for my submission would be greatly appreciated.
![]() ![]() Last edited by justrun7; 03-21-2017 at 07:45 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are 2 different series of S74s. There are white background ones that came with a paper ad backing originally (as yours is and used to have one) and there are colored background ones. The colored ones have the mfg and factory info at top and bottom of the front and no paper back. SGC only grades the white ones, without backing, as AUT....if I recall correctly. Good luck.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe Leon is correct that SGC will grade all whites without backing as "A".
The colored silks, which you know can include white or whitish-looking examples, have no backing, have the factory and manufacturer info as Leon mentioned, and are longer in size. IMO, they are not worth grading, and SGC is all over the board on these. This is one set where I routinely crack them out of the holders, as the silks are durable and not easily damaged and again, the grading is inconsistent, IMO. Here's one of mine: ![]() Edited to add: To be clear, I didn't mean to suggest they are not very valuable and thus not worth the grading--I love 'em and they will fetch nice $$$ when they look nice. Rather, I don't see the value added in paying for the privilege and I think you will end up disappointed and/or baffled by the grading results.
__________________
"You start a conversation, you can't even finish it You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed Say something once, why say it again?" If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 03-21-2017 at 11:30 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the info. Since it will only grade authentic, I may reconsider getting it graded. I guess it will come down to whether or not I want a slab for protection.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have only one S74-1 and several S74-2 in my Highlander type collection. My Hemphill's are a good example of the difference between the two. My Fords are a good example of another variation of S74-2 being that they have a white background with different color player instead of all one color. Anybody have any thoughts on this ????
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The S74 colored silks came in at least nine distinct colors, with many shades within each color. Off the top of my head: blue, green, tan. ivory, gold, purple, red, pink and orange. Some are more difficult (orange, purple, red and tan) but command very little, if any. premium. Blue and green are the most common. The ink comes in various shades of blue, black, red and brown, depending on the background color. Some colored silks have been observed with blank paper backing. It is unclear if this was as originally issued. A few examples can be seen on my website below.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Also, these are not printed on silk. In fact, if you view the advertisement on the back of a white version silk it clearly states these are on satin material. See post #5 above. And if you've ever held and felt the material of a white version silk, I'm not so sure you'd call it satin either. Not sure where the description "silk" originally came from and why that stuck as the name for these S-74s. I've always assumed it was from early collectors, like Burdick, lumping these in with other similar collectibles that actually were printed on silk, and just giving them all that same "S" designation that was used in the American Card Catalog. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's an example of a white silk with the Red Sun ad on the paper back:
__________________
Seeking very scarce/rare cards for my Sam Rice master collection, e.g., E210 York Caramel Type 2 (upgrade), 1931 W502, W504 (upgrade), W572 sepia, W573, 1922 Haffner's Bread, 1922 Keating Candy, 1922 Witmor Candy Type 2 (vertical back), 1926 Sports Co. of Am. with ad & blank backs. Also 1917 Merchants Bakery & Weil Baking cards of WaJo. Also E222 cards of Lipe, Revelle & Ryan. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great info. I concur that Burdick probably just lumped the silks and their ilk together...
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The ilk of silk was the verdict of Burdick The cotton was rotten and soon forgotten.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: S74 Silk Art Fletcher | GrayGhost | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 12-18-2011 04:10 PM |
Help with the age of a LSU Silk Tobacco card | theantiquetiger | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 04-28-2010 05:43 AM |
S74 Silk | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-05-2008 04:17 PM |
For Sale Page: E-card, 19th Century, Postcards, Memorabilia, Silk | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 06-30-2007 11:57 AM |
looking for an S81 silk | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-24-2007 01:44 PM |