 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-15-2016, 03:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Grading...oy!
Recently liberated from a PSA slab. Care to guess the grade?
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. 
|
|
#2
06-15-2016, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
3 st?
|
|
#3
06-15-2016, 03:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No creases or wrinkles.
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
|
#5
06-15-2016, 03:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was a straight PSA 2. Priced accordingly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
|
#6
06-15-2016, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nice pick up. RayB
__________________
Legacy Board Member Since 2009. Hundreds of successful transactions here on Network 54. Buy/Sell/Trade with Confidence.
|
|
#7
06-15-2016, 04:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks. I've seen worse snow on the front of this card on PSA 6's and 7's before.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
|
#8
06-15-2016, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Psa 1.5 I was going to say 2 but that was everyone's guess. If it was not for the roller marks or smears on the back I would guess a four .
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼
|
|
#9
06-15-2016, 07:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not sure what it is on the back other than a stain. It's not sticky. But obviously the reason for the grade. Doesn't bother me in any case and I wound up spending about half what I would have on this card... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
|
|
#10
06-15-2016, 07:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can't opt
Out of mk. Or mc. If the card has one or the other and it's not listed it's a mistake and yes I know about the Wagner with the back stamp like I said a mistake.
|
|
#11
06-15-2016, 07:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Grading...oy!
You lost me a bit there but yes, PSA has been known to make mistakes. Sometimes it seems as if their own criteria is merely a suggestion...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 06-15-2016 at 07:32 PM.
|
|
#12
06-15-2016, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grading then and now... | jchcollins | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 11-19-2015 08:44 AM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| psa grading p2 | esd10 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-15-2012 08:04 AM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
| SMR Grading PSA 4 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-22-2006 12:09 PM |
Linear Mode
