![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I've the following Leaf Musial which has pretty good eye appeal and was thinking of getting it graded, in preparation for a sale. I've very little experience with grading and was wondering if the stamp on the back would automatically cause it to grade poor by either PSA or SGC. any thoughts? thanks Bob
__________________
My wantlist http://www.oldbaseball.com/wantlists...tag=bdonaldson Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My thoughts - for what they are worth - are that you will NOT automatically receive a "POOR" grade, but PSA will give you an "MK" qualifier. SGC does NOT so designate cards with marks.
If you are selling it, I would have it graded, but I would GUESS that you would not get better than a PSA 4 VG-EX... Again, just MY opinion! Good luck! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think I see a slight vertical surface crease on the card, so depending on how strong it is in hand, I think you would receive a 2 or 3 grade with the MK qualifier from PSA. SGC typically drops cards with marks down to 20/1.5 (Fair) grades, so not exactly sure how they will treat the stamp. I assume they will still say it's a mark, and go with 20/1.5.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Anyways, I'll probably grade it with PSA, knowing that I won't automatically get a 1. Thanks for all the feedback Bob
__________________
My wantlist http://www.oldbaseball.com/wantlists...tag=bdonaldson Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let us know! I'm curious to know what PSA thinks....
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geez... everyone's hung up on the grade (j/k)
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
AGREED...upon further review! I DID say NOT BETTER THAN, but you are right!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's a pretty nice 4, Bobby. I'm not sure if there's some sort of wrinkle that downgraded that card, but it looks nice enough for a 5 or even 6. I wouldn't be totally surprised if Bob's card got a 4MK even with a surface wrinkle. I think you saw the 3.5 for the T206 that was graded earlier today on the main forum.
Last edited by glchen; 12-17-2015 at 01:08 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 12-17-2015 at 02:24 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA grading question | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-02-2015 11:08 AM |
psa grading question | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-06-2014 08:58 PM |
Grading Question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-13-2007 10:36 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
SGC grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-14-2006 04:31 AM |