 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Undergraded ??? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
6 | 11.32% |
| No |
  
|
16 | 30.19% |
| Graded just right |
  
|
31 | 58.49% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
10-31-2015, 01:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Is it just me or do these seem undergraded ???
I used to think SGC was the more consistent of the grading companies but these couple leave me scratching my head.
Thoughts ? Just added Danny Murphy MC ??? Trimmed ??? If so not sure why it got a numerical grade or even past a 10/1
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% Last edited by Joshchisox08; 10-31-2015 at 03:42 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Undergraded Cards: Show Yours | GasHouseGang | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 25 | 02-02-2014 12:30 PM |
| Undergraded??? | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-15-2013 06:51 AM |
| Undergraded? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 03-25-2010 01:10 AM |
| Undergraded???....lets see 'em | wolfdogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 12-01-2009 09:38 AM |
| Truly undergraded or trimmed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-15-2008 09:31 AM |
Threaded Mode