 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-15-2014, 08:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
E98 Set of 30 Ty Cobb variation....PSA.....
It never ceases to amuse me as to how all the experts at PSA & PSA/DNA can make so many errors. (Maybe this is really an Orange variation of an E98??). I recently received this back from PSA. On my submission form I even described it as a 1910 W-UNC ORANGE BORDER. I know all I have to do to get it labeled correctly is mail it back at my expense and they will return it correct. Shouldn't have to because an error of this magnitude of such a rare card should NEVER happen in the first place.
Do you agree or disagree? Can someone from PSA comment? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Variation help | howard38 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 12-12-2013 03:39 PM |
| Slight T206 Cobb Red Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-26-2008 04:17 PM |
| T206 Cobb - ORANGE color variation PSA 5 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-31-2006 12:39 PM |
| Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-30-2005 09:54 PM |
| B18 Variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-19-2005 01:50 PM |
Threaded Mode