 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-29-2013, 09:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Is it just me, or is sometimes the lower graded card BETTER looking??
Wanted to compare these two and get opinions. You would think the higher graded card would be deemed "superior" and worth more money than the lower graded card. Doesn't seem so in this instance. Did PSA just overgrade one and undergrade the other? Or are the grades spot on?
 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: t206 SGC (lower) graded HOFers | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-02-2013 05:19 AM |
| trading for lower graded E97 and E101 | t213 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2012 04:30 PM |
| FS: 1955 Topps Graded and Raw (Prices VCP or Lower) | Bunker | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-13-2011 05:26 PM |
| FS: 20 Card Graded T206 Lot - Lower Grade **PRICE DROP** | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 08-10-2011 07:59 PM |
| T205 Suggs Graded 1 (or lower) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-06-2005 11:16 AM |
Threaded Mode