 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
02-15-2013, 10:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The Chicago Cubs were known as the Colts in the early 1890s, but the team in your photo looks one player short of a nine.
The uniforms look baseballish, and there are definitely too few players there for a football team.
__________________
-- the three idiots at Baseball Games https://baseballgames.dreamhosters.com/ https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/baseballgames/ Successful transactions with: bocabirdman, GrayGhost, jimivintage, Oneofthree67, orioles93, quinnsryche, thecatspajamas, ValKehl 
|
|
#4
02-16-2013, 05:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Could that be the Newport Colts? Late 1800s team in the New England League maybe?
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby.
|
|
#5
02-16-2013, 05:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Might be the Richmond Colts. Minor League Team that played in the Virginia League 1906-1914 and then again 1918-1928.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
