![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How would you grade this VG or just Good?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think that qualifies as a gd-vg
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
forgot the back
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a killer raw card, keep it that way!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All four corners show creases. Good.
Agree with Dan about keeping it raw. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Closer to gd than vg but a good candidate for a 2.5
JimB |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good feedback because I was thinking about buying it, guy wants close to 200 and if it's VG I would offer close to that but Good seems a little high at close to 200. I was leaning more toward Good too so I don't know about paying close to 200 now
Last edited by zljones; 02-23-2012 at 08:33 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1. Oh, and I'd grade it GD as well.
__________________
Tony A. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Without considering that blemish on the bottom left, I'd be inclined to say Vg since there are no creases other than the corners. It's hard to say from the scan what that is on the bottom left, so that might influence it downward. To me, if the dings stay pretty much in the corners, I'd say it's Vg. To each his own...
Take Care, Geno Last edited by HercDriver; 02-23-2012 at 08:43 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Technically Good, with enough eye appeal to bump it half a grade to Good+.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks everyone, I agree it seems to be a 2.5, I wanted other opinions. My next question is, is it too much to pay $175-200 for it? VCP has hardly any records of this card, so that's no help. One sold as a BIN on ebay a month or two ago in PSA3 for 175, but good condition graded only sold for like 90-130. I wish I had other options, but this card is quite rare.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure about SGC, but I'd expect a 1 or 1.5, stretching for a 2 from PSA. Guessing $115.00 for the card. Nice card though.
![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Clutch-Hitter; 02-24-2012 at 10:39 AM. Reason: added image |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow that Foxx you have is harshly graded by PSA, sometimes I think they grade prewar too harshly
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I the Foxx tonight for $150
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good pick-up on that key card.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good+
__________________
CASSIDYS SPORTSCARDS - Vintage Baseball Cards 1909 - 1976 https://www.ebluejay.com/store/CASSIDYS_SPORTSCARDS |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Now two cards away from completing my R323 HOF set with cartoons.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I got this card yesterday and the glue smudge at the bottom left corner is gone, the seller was nice enough to carefully remove it for me before shipping, would this now have a much better chance of scoring VG?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1. Haven't visited for awhile--hope everyone's doing well!
Regards, Larry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Top Dollar Paid For Ultra High Grade Cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2008 08:45 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
Problems with requesting an "authentic" grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-27-2006 06:44 AM |
Change it up: Post you low grade, high grades! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-28-2006 06:58 AM |
Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 11:30 AM |