regars tris speaker 1912 colorized pict.

[cookie]

I,m sorry but the pict. is under cards -pre world war II.And pict. is def . speaker at fenway park circa 191It is undeniably him and is marked on the back in light pencil.Again because of the tint is hard to get a better pict. on.any info would again be greatly appreciated.Thanks,Marshall

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by cookie

I,m sorry but the pict. is under cards -pre world war II.And pict. is def . speaker at fenway park circa 191It is undeniably him and is marked on the back in light pencil.Again because of the tint is hard to get a better pict. on.any info would again be greatly appreciated.Thanks,Marshall

I think one more thread and you'll start getting some responses. It's just hard to notice when you only have three threads going.

You are telling us that it says it's Speaker on the back.

I've seen this picture before, we've debated it, and I don't think there was ever any consensus as to whether or not it was Speaker. Even if it IS him, it's not a particularly interesting image. Sorry, but that's how I see it.

[Leon]

I think one more thread about this subject and we will have one less member. Enough is enough....I deleted a few threads that were 100% redundant already. Maybe less time on chat boards and more time on learning how to write could be in order.