![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many in the hobby has fallen into the rookie card craze. I'll be honest, myself included. But there are always NON-Rookie cards that are as equally desirable in any Post-War collection. I'm looking to include modern cards on this list as well...
I'll start with 1952 Topps Pafko 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese 1953 Topps Satchel Paige 1959 Topps Roy Campanella Symbol of Courage 1972 OPC Gil Hodges*memorial card 1989 Fleer Bill Ripken F***Face and obviously the '52 Mantle Can anyone else think of any other cards that would qualify here? Last edited by novakjr; 06-25-2011 at 12:51 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1971 Topps Thurman Munson
1961 Topps Roger Maris 1954 Topps The O'Brien Twins ![]() Last edited by scmavl; 06-25-2011 at 01:09 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As soon as I saw this thread the first card that came to my mind was the 1972 Topps Steve Garvey, as it's worth more then his rookie |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
have always found the 1960 Maris to be very popular since it's his first in a NY uni.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I guess I'll add the 1982 Topps Traded Ozzie Smith to this list then.. Possibly even the OPC despite still showing him in his padres uni, since it at least has the Trade to the Cardinals mentioned on the card front.. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love the 1964 Topps Pete Rose.
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+1
I think a lot of the second year cards are popular, especially when the rookie shared a card with other players. '68 Seaver '69 Ryan '69 Bench '71 Munson '82 TT Ripken Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 06-28-2011 at 08:38 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, 1st individual cards are very popular...The '82 Traded Ripken may be my favorite modern card. The Traded Ripken may also be the last great card that fits this scenario.. Unfortunately, with the vast amount of companies in modern times, scenarios like this have disappeared. Because if Topps had a player on a multi-rookie card, odds are that one of the other companies had them on an individual card.. Hell, nowadays, do they even bother with multi-player rookies? Why would a company make 1 card of 3 or 4 people, when they can make 3 or 4 throw-away cards...Unfortunately that's all that the modern base cards have become..Filler. The baseball card equivalent of packing peanuts..
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 1953 Bowman Pee Wee Reese was the first card that popped in my mind to answer this question.
Is there a better vintage action shot photo on any card? I cant think of one. Cheers, Patrick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for me it is easily the 71 munson and 53 reese
__________________
my 1952 topps set less than 60 to go!!! also looking for psa 3-6 1954 topps hockey looking for 1952 topps high series commons |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Sale: Baseball Hall of Fame Rookie Cards | bcbgcbrcb | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2011 06:59 AM |
Defining pre-war rookie cards! Ahhh..... | DanP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 02-28-2011 06:07 PM |
A Few OPC Rookie Cards From Hockey's Forgotten Dynasty | Bosox Blair | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 7 | 06-01-2010 01:02 PM |
Classics Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-14-2005 10:53 PM |
FOR SALE - Jesse Haines Rookie Cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-30-2005 09:00 PM |