|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  Type I versus Type II :  I'm a little confused 
			
			The definition of Type I versus Type II is stated from Henry Yee's usual wonderful assortment of photos:  Type II photos thus may be printed approximately 2 or more years after the original photo was taken and from the original negative. For a photo taken in 1910, how is it at all possible to tell whether the print was made in 1910 or say 1916 or 1920? In the 1980s, I printed copies my own photos from the original negatives several years apart and now a number of years later, I can't tell which were printed first. Is there a leap of faith required on the authentication of Type I versus Type II photos or am I missing something? Thanks, Max Thanks, Max 
				__________________ Max Weder www.flickr.com/photos/baseballart for baseball art, books, ephemera, and cards and Twitter @maxweder | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Does anyone have this E121 type? | sreader3 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 07-03-2010 08:10 PM | 
| R314 Type 4&5 on eBay | buckyball1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 05-06-2010 12:43 AM | 
| Baseball - Vintage Type I Press Photos - 1930s-40s Ending Tonight Nov. 6th on Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 3 | 11-06-2009 08:25 AM | 
| Boxing type card "set" - mostly pre war | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 11-11-2008 05:00 PM | 
| E107 - Type I vs. Type II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 07-17-2005 12:17 AM |