![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have long thought that the E90-1 Young Cleveland card does not picture Cy Young, even though it was intended to be Cy. I recently came across a picture of Irv Young from a newspaper in 1905 that shows a similar profile view of Irv as is shown on the E90-1 Young Cleveland card. Just from looking at his nose, it is clear to me that the E90-1 card was created from a picture of Irv. Anyone agree or disagree?
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It looks like Irv but Irv was left handed and it looks like the player is right handed on the E90-1. On the E97's it is clearly Irv marked as Cy.....
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the e90-1 image is reversed from the newspaper photo.
Troy - it looks right to me. I wonder if they flipped it knowing it was Irv and that Cy pitched with the other hand. I had always assumed it was just a lousy artist, but that looks exactly like Irv reverse from the photo you posted. edited to add, now I'm confused - the newspaper article says Cy Young... Last edited by Matt; 06-09-2010 at 10:31 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Matt, one of Irv's many nicknames was "Young" Cy Young (in reference to the original Cy Young) so it is talking about Irv. It does look like Irv (at least more so than Cy) based off a similar photo to the one in the newspaper. OR it could just be a really crappy artist rendition, the E90-1 set is full of 'em (ie Joe Jackson). The E90-1's are interesting /c while some players look unmistakable, others look just as generic as their E91-C counterparts!
-Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks a lot more like Irv than Cy to me... nice observation!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The shape of the outline of the face on both card and article look to be pretty exact, just in reverse.
The article does indicate 'Young' Cy Young, which I think is how Irv was quite often identified at the time. Great detective work Troy...the value of this E90-1 as well as the E92 Dockman, etc. that share this artwork should accordingly plummet because this now should not be known as Irv Young, not Cy Young. Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 06-09-2010 at 11:03 AM. Reason: more fo, better fo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The card was clearly intended to picture Cy as the team name indicates, so I doubt it would ever be valued as an "Irv." Plus, I'm not sure anyone who ever owned one looked at it and felt they had an image resembling Cy. The value of the E97 is precedent here as well.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Exactly. And FWIW the E97 is even a more questionable case, as the team designation does not put it 100% as Cy Young (vs. Irv). Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Irv Young $18 ppd | timn1 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-04-2009 07:40 PM |
Revisiting the Irv Young/Cy Young E97 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 05-25-2007 05:56 PM |
E97 Young - T206 Young Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-22-2007 11:04 AM |
E97 Cy Young = t206 Irv Young? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2006 12:12 PM |
Irv Young cards needed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-24-2002 01:54 PM |