![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Most of my collecting the past few years has been on T cards (T206 in particular). But I enjoy learning about the other cards as well.
I've been spending some time becoming familiar with the E90-1 set, but there's something I don't understand: For McLean, Shean, and Upp, both PSA and SGC gives them weighting factors of 1 - 2 for their registrys. But when I look in the Standard Catalog (2009), I find that they are valued at about 14 times that of a common. Can someone please explain why there is such a discrepancy between the PSA/SGC weightings and the Std Cat value? Thanks for your time and best regards, Craig
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Question for the T210 Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-05-2008 12:21 AM |
question for mvsnyc and other T206 experts on southern league | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-25-2008 07:31 PM |
question for M116 experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-27-2007 06:23 AM |
QUESTION FOR ALL YOU EBAY EXPERTS | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-05-2004 11:15 PM |
SCD Question for Mr. Lemke or other experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-13-2002 04:46 PM |