![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if anyone has opinions on grading of this postcard. The reason I ask, it has a pinhole on the top. What number grade do you think it would get from SGC? The postcard has no writing on the back.
Thanks Joe Last edited by jcmtiger; 05-08-2009 at 03:00 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
because of the pinhole - an SGC 10
otherwise it looks like an SGC 40 or so (hard to tell from scan if there is creasing / wrinkles).
__________________
Joe D. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think no better than a 10.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have talked to SGC at lenght about pin holes. I have a card that is a SGC 30 with 2 pin holes that was reviewed and still held the grade. That being said I would think this would get a 30 or at worse a 20. I think the pin hole does less damage as far as the grade then if it had writing on the back.
James G |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
writing = 10
pinhole = 20 writing with a pinhole = priceless |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
a 20
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would be very interesting to see what it would get. Is it a tack hole or a pin hole? I have seen many T5s with not much more than a tack hole and they routinely are awarded 10s (with no writing).
Last edited by HRBAKER; 05-08-2009 at 04:24 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
IMO
A 10 because of the other wear and also the pinhole is so obvious (has wear too). If card was sharper with a small pinhole then maybe a 20-30. Nice collector grade card, with good eye appeal ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the input on the card. I think I will call SGC and see what they say. If this card can only receive a 10 I probably won't get it graded.
Joe |
![]() |
|
|