![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: brock
Hi |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jason L
perhaps a PSA 5 or 6 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
It really doesn't look trimmed on the scan. Do you think that it is? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Marc S.
PSA 6 o/c |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anthony
I'd guess a 5, due to centering. This is probably one of those cases where it would be cheaper to buy a card already graded. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
I go along with the others on the grade. To my tastes, though, I wouldn't mind the top-to-bottom centering issue as much on this particular card than in other years, because the Topps '64 card design has a lot of white area on top to begin with, as well as bold lettering, hence the bottom is not what catches my eye. I think you can get away with that more than if it had L-R centering issues, as far as eye appeal. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To grade or not to grade, T206 Cobb style... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-23-2008 06:16 AM |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
Wanted mid grade to high grade of E97's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-19-2006 09:05 PM |
Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |