![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: George Leidemer
Hello, first posts, happy collecting. been submitting to PSA for the past 4 years and got a submission back today. Never fight with them about grades but this issue really ticks me off. Submitted a 1928 Yuengling's Ice Cream Cobb in the EX range which if I am correct and pulled a PSA 5 tonight would have been their highest on the pop report, not sure if sgc has graded one higher. Logged in to my account and it came back N8: MISCUT. Spoke to a manager and they confirmed no alteration(she stated this would have been noted), also stated it wasnt undersized or it would be noted minimum size requirement. This has happened twice in 4 years and ended up eventually sending to sgc, (remember my T206 bender 4 in one piedmont miscut being one of the other times) and sgc slabbed both with no problems. Please help, why do some t206's i have get an MC qualifier or the jumbo wagner that sold recently, and some get returned unslabbed. george |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA - Why not slab miscut cards?!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-10-2008 12:14 PM |
PSA Set Registry -- Tattle Tale or Due Diligence | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-14-2007 10:31 AM |
My fortune due to PSA umm, oversight? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-27-2006 01:16 PM |
Graded Miscut cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-20-2005 11:48 AM |
Low PSA grade due to color? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-28-2005 06:57 AM |