![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I picked this up not too long ago and will be sending it into SGC tomorrow to be graded....Just curious what ya'll think the grade will be? I have under $100 into it and don't think it's trimmed...but what do you think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Leon - nice card. Maybe it's just the scan, but the left and right edges appear wavy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Assuming there are no creases, the card looks like an 84, no? Four nice corners. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bruce Dorskind
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
AUT or 86. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I will be very surprised if it turns out to be trimmed. The scan might make you think there is some sort of wave to a border but I don't see it in person. Note- I have been wrong before...... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
It just seems a little thin side to side. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Knock on wood and I am going to guess an 86 or 88. I do have the privilege of seeing it in person and with a 6x and there is almost no fuzziness in any corner. I just don't see a waviness or narrowness to the borders either.........but again, I have been wrong before.... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Lines drawn with Photoshop ruler, without adjusting card horizontally |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
It is hard to judge the corners from the scan, but it looks like an 84 or 86, possibly 88 if they are really sharp. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
I think it is a nice looking card. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paulstratton
The borders on the Hooper and Wambsganss(the only 2 I could find for reference) in your personal collection look big compared to this McGraw. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
My guess is authentic, the card might have been cut that way by the factory but my experience with E122's is that that card is too narrow side to side. Here are 3 typical cards from the set... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Authentic |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I agree....but look at your card on the left. That left border is original and wavy as can be and I would bet it's a factory cut....I hope that this is a factory cut on the one I have and SGC labels it with a number.....Also, this did come from outside our little vintage arena so am not worried about it having been trimmed for nefarious reasons. I am told that trimming for deception is easier to do top to bottom...as there is less area to trim. That being said I do know many hobby old timers routinely cut down cards to fit in holders and binders. I guess we shall see... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ali_lapoint
from the front it doesn't look trimmed. but when you look at the scan of the back it looks really really suspect. i feel like its definitely trimmed. i dont usually see the e122's with such thin borders. if its not trimmed it is a really oddly cut e122. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: bigfish
1st guess is "A" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
I hope you get an 84 or better...but I'd guess SML - or Authentic if you ask them to slab it no matter what. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
Leon..how about I give you $125...you can make a little money, save the SGC fee, and not have to worry about any trimming? Sound like a good idea? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
If I sent it in, it would grade a 40. Good luck. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: peter ullman
How does it measure...most I've had were oversized...i think it appears scalped...unfortunately...scg A...unless you know someone! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Gem authentic. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ken McMillan
sgc 60 ... what is the prize if the guess is right? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob D.
$902.84 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
AUTH |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
If I submit it, authentic. If Leon submits it, EX+. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
90% A, 8% 80, 1.5% 84, .5% 86. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
AUT (95%) or 80 (5%) |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
IMO too narrow even w/the "natural" variations in the set. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
resubmit? guess my grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 02-04-2009 12:37 PM |
E122 Babe | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 04-09-2008 08:52 AM |
Looking for E122 cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-23-2008 06:54 PM |
see if you guys can guess the grade and should i get them graded | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-18-2007 11:44 PM |
Books don't get no respect no how...guess my grade | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 06-11-2007 05:37 AM |