![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I didn't want to necessarily get a discussion going on the Mastro thread so here is the sister card of the one that was won last night...I wonder if it too is 1902? I had the choice, when I bought mine, of the one that sold last night and/or this one....it was a close call. I should have bought both |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
nice piece leon. Classic Lajoie bat on right shoulder pose. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
Great card of Nap! So too the one in Mastro. If you trust Okkonen's work on uniforms, though, the cards date to 1903 or 1904. The '02 Cleveland dark uniforms had no "C" on the cap and the socks were solid not striped. The uni on yours matches '03-'04--after that, they changed again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Thanks for the info....personally the date was not a concern for me....though I could see it being a big concern if I was going for the Rookie subset thingy.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bryan Long
I was really wanting that card from Mastro - but just couldn't do it. It was a cool card and would have looked nice in my collection |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
I don't know about Leon's card with the Cramer's Dry Plate ad on back, but the company advertising the Dry Plate for the Mastro Lajoie was sold in Aug 1902 to Eastman Kodak - that is a fact. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
Leon: |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
I'm not trying to start an argument, just pointing out what Okkonen's research shows. If you google M.A. Seed Dry Plate, at least one site claims that Eastman Kodak continued to use the M.A. Seed name after acquisition, and published a manual under the M.A. Seed name in 1906. See note 20 at: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I have only ever seen, or heard about, these 2 cards that are similar to each other. No others at all...... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Todd - |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
In my opinion, 1902-1904 is the correct time frame as those are the only years of the decade when Cleveland wore the dark colored uniforms. I guess the card could have been produced later with an old photo but I doubt it since the advertiser on the back of the card was a photo company themselves and would not have had to rely on someone else's old photo to produce the trade card. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SOLD - 1900's M. A. Seed Dry Plate Comp. - Nap Lajoie HOF (SGC Auth) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 01-23-2009 08:43 AM |
Need help with old baseball plate | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 06-12-2008 04:20 PM |
E90-1 Lajoie to Trade for E101-Bender-Tinker-Lajoie-Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-14-2008 10:44 PM |
Keep 'em dry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-11-2006 05:33 PM |
h-unc Dry Plate Lajoie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-18-2004 08:10 AM |