 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-23-2008, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Worth grading low-mid grade commons?
Posted By: David R
I always go back and forth on this question and wanted to see what others thought. I have a number of T202 commons, probably mostly in the SGC 30 - SGC 50 range, maybe a 60 or two if I'm lucky. Assuming I eventually want to trade or sell them, is it worth getting them graded. I often have the same debate with common T206s and T205s. Any thoughts? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking to trade 1955 Bowman mid-grade raw commons | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-15-2007 09:01 AM |
| T207 wanted -- low/mid commons | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 06-15-2007 04:34 PM |
| Just Listed: Mid-high grade vintage commons; tough types | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 09-14-2006 10:04 AM |
| two more tabacco cards low and mid grade | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 09-07-2006 10:18 AM |
| Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |
Threaded Mode