![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I picked this up in a group of Exhibits a few years ago. I have looked through my OldCardboard magazines, and while I have a complete run, didn't see Adam's article (hi Adam), right off hand. I also looked in the SCD for the answer but didn't see it there either, and since it's a slow board day, figure I will ask the question here.. Is this a 1925 Exhibit or a 1926 Exhibit, and do both come as a Postcard? Would the postcard variety add any value to one? regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
if the name is in a panel it's a 1925 or thats what i think anyway. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: G. Maines
It would be nice to have a list of Old Cardboard subjects referenced by Issue No. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
That's what I thought too but I don't see any references to postcard backs on 1925's? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
The cards are not known with a PC back and I have never seen any exhibit with that style of PC back. I suspect the POST CARD is a stamp added after the fact. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dennis
that looks like a "home-made" postcard,stamped on back,not printed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I also thought the postcard insignia looked hand stamped but I really don't know these too well....Since we are here what about the date of this Heilmann? I can't tell if it's a darn 1922 or a 1926....the printing looks similar and the SCD says that 1926's could have either had a postcard back or not. This one has probably been soaked out of an album to get that overprint thingy on the back.....I appreciate the help on a slow day...regards |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
Heilman is from the 1926-29 PC Back Exhibit set (or more correctly 1925-1931) and is from the 1925 printing. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
of entertainment exhibit cards stamped or printed with ads for movie theaters and I have seen a few different home-made PC backs in the past. Nothing of this sort ever by ESCO, though. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
For my own knowledge how can you tell it's from that set and not the 1922 set? They look the same to me if there is no PC back.... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Mohler
Hi Leon |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Thanks Jeff.... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
What Jeff said. Here are some 1922's which all have the distinctive thin cursive names. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BobbyBHockey
Here is a great site for Exhibits: |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Lyman
Gil: thanks for your suggestion. We do plan to index all Old Cardboard articles sometime next year. With Issue #14 coming in January, it is hard (even for us) to keep track of which articles are in which issues. Just about all articles are now referenced on the appropriate Set Profile page on the website. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
The blank backs were the 1925 first series of the PC back set. They were followed by a printing wth a split format PC back that says "This side for correspondence" on the left, which were in turn followed by various backs that say "not for use in exhibit machines" on the left. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
Based on all of the discussion in this thread about the production dates of the Exhibits P/C Backs set, what do you think are the chances of the main grading companies (SGC & PSA) changing the dates of the issue on their new submissions for this issue? Prior labels always show the set as 1926-29. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jeffdrum
Adam, |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
Earlier hobby resources break them down differently. According to Elwood "Woody" Scharf, the father of exhibit card cataloging, the 1921 Powell has the stands in the background while the 1923-24 card has the blacked out background. He reported it this way in an article in the 1970s in The Trader Speaks. This would be in keeping with the other reused cards I've seen where the images were changed (e.g., Veach). Beckett's old Baseball Collectibles book listed the 1921-22-23-24 cards as one issue and also reflects only two variations: with or without background. The three-card designation crops in in the standard catalog. Since there were numerous errors in the SCD exhibit lists (I weeded out only the ones in the PC back set), I would not be surprised if there are really only two cards: the 1921 (stands background) and the 1923-24 (blacked out background). I've seen far more of the stands background cards too. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Mohler
I don't want to hijack the thread, but some of the 1922 Exhibits come with a "made in the USA" stamp on the back. Adam was kind enough to supply me with an email stating that this was a factory stamp. SGC listened and upgraded my card from a 30 to an 80. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: 1925 Exhibit Champions | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-19-2009 04:02 PM |
1925 Exhibit Grimes, R316 Lindstrom | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-29-2007 09:33 PM |
1925 Exhibit Ty Cobb For Sale | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-13-2007 02:54 PM |
Anyone selling a 1925 Exhibit of Gehrig? | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-03-2006 05:51 PM |
1925 or 1926??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-18-2005 10:03 PM |