![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken W.
Is this possibly legit? Or is this a fake with an equally fake grading company? Hate to out an auction, but I've never heard of CSA. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
The card looks and is most likely real...the problem is it is most likely altered as well. CSA is notorious for grading trimmed or colored cards. And the grade is usually 2-3 higher then what it should be by a legitimate grading company. I learned the hard way about 5 years ago and bought a T206 Matty Port in a CSA 9 that came back trimmed from PSA. Unless it is graded by SGC, PSA, GAI or BVG there is a lot doubt and high risk involved in buying. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Almost always, there is a reason a card is in the holder it is in, and not some other holder. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: boxingcardman
There have been quite a few bad and overgraded cards in their holders. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
Box, |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Bobby - certainly every company can make mistakes, but CSA is an entirely different league then SGC/GAI/PSA. In my experience. their "mistakes" border on negligence and are exponentially more common then with the big 3. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
If it's not altered it looks like a 3 or a 4, because there is some back staining. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
Matt, |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Bobby - sorry - I missed reading the bolded title on the message you were responding to. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
right border trimmed........look at top left and then right borders and likely soaked out of something because of the back staining. Still worth the bid now and relatively clean front on the card. Good colors....... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken W.
Thanks guys. My main concern was authenticity. The card looked OK to me, but wasn't sure if that grading company was even a real company - I've been burned by that AAA son-of-a-..... Not sure if I'll bid yet. Still a pretty low price as of now, even if it has been altered. I don't really care about that stuff, since I never sell anything. Just NO REPRINTS. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Ken - your issue is going to be that people who think CSA is a legit grading company are going to bid this up to close to where it would be if it was. I've seen it on enough ebay auctions to know that once I see a CSA auction I just go right on by. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Ken- I would stay away from that card. I think you will regret it if you buy it. Just my professional opinion. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: anthony
looks more trimmed on the bottom than the right...just my opinion, not on my list anyways |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for N162 Cap Anson | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-26-2007 10:05 PM |
1888 N162 Tim Keefe (graded), and 1887 Allen & Ginter Cap Anson (graded) wanted! | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 3 | 10-06-2006 05:52 PM |
OJ Cap Anson | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-29-2005 06:34 PM |
Cap Anson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-10-2005 04:58 PM |
according to Cap Anson...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-07-2003 03:32 PM |