![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
The image was taken from a Larry Fritsch "Card Museum" card. The picture almost looks hand-drawn. Whether the actual card appears this way or if the image was enhanced for presentation is open for debate. On the reverse of the museum card it is stated that Larry purchased the card for a dollar from a stamp dealer in the early 1970's. It also says that it is most likely one of a kind. Estimated value in 1988...$1000. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark
Cool pog. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
Everything about that looks wrong from the fact it looks like a line drawing to the font look different than any other Colgan. It almost looks like a fantasy piece. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
I agree Jay...kinda adds to the mystery. Has anyone ever actually seen this card? There are many rumors about is existence (or non-existence). I've been collecting these for about twelve years but am far from a Colgan's expert; but as Jay stated and I said in my initial post...this doesn't look like any Colgan's that I have ever seen. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: eric p.
that is a legit copy of thorpe, i have seen a thorpe up close and i know of 2 thorpes that exist. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Harry Wallace (HW)
I agree, it does have a somewhat funny look to it, but it is real. There are other cards in the set that have this sort of look also. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: brian
i know an Illinois collector that has the Colgan's tin top of Thorpe, but never heard of a red border Thorpe. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
So there are only two Thorpes and only three Jacksons known to survive from this set. That just seems wierd to me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
Sorry for the bump, but the search feature here stinks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
What are you searching for? The search feature works well.....You just have to "finagle" it a little... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
When I search, I can only find links to single responses within a thread -- not a link to the entire entire thread. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I find only single responses too....but those responses are about 1-2 clicks away from the entire thread if you know how to do that? Not trying to be condescending but that is the way I do it. Once you find "a" post, then the thread is linked to that post and you just click on the thread... Does that make sense? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I see what you mean now....I agree that feature is not good for looking at the whole thread at once....finding stuff is ok but reading all of it at once is impossible, without clicking on each post, unless you bump the whole thread. I agree it could definitely be better. It's not really the "search" part of it, it's the operational part......semantics I guess......but you are correct.... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
It's pretty simple to see the whole thread when you search. In the website address you will see "message" change it to "thread" and ta-da! The whole thread appears not a bunch of single messages you have to click on. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
You are a genius....it works like a charm....just replace the word "message" with "thread" and we can see the whole thing...... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
one of the things I disliked about search just went away with your tip! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
Thanks Sean |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Thanks, when I "found" this, it was like what fibonacci must have felt like. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wesley
That is great. Thanks Sean. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
its worth repeating..... |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: andy becker
sean, |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Sean, |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Max, |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Gah! How could I not read your entire post? Apologies. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
Could somebody repost an image of the card? Thanks! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I think these are the ones. (from the other thread) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
Grading in the 22nd century . . . |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Bruce- will round cards only be graded in increments of pi? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Max Weder
Barry |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Davis
2.7% is huge. Ask any backgammon player or other serious gamblers. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Max- I haven't a clue what those numbers are all about. P.S.- did you get my package yet? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David Davis
Barry, |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I used to be a pretty good backgammon player but not at that level. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BUYING COLGAN'S (ALL TYPES) E254,E270 TINTOPS,E270 RED BORDERS | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 08-17-2009 12:42 PM |
E270 Colgans | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-13-2007 09:23 AM |
Mastro Thorpe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 05-07-2007 09:30 PM |
Jim Thorpe? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-11-2006 04:14 AM |
Jim Thorpe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-13-2002 11:00 AM |